Previous Page  15 / 16 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 15 / 16 Next Page
Page Background

Earthen architecture had structural qualities too: it had equilibrium and cohesion. It ranged

from simple single storey buildings to multi-storey construction, in Yemen for example.

Yioutani-Iacovides explained the ancient and new construction techniques: cob (a structural

component) and wattle and daub (infill); rammed earth, i.e. pisé de terre (monolithic

construction); and adobe, i.e. mudbricks. She explained each technique by highlight the basic

traditional method and identifying examples of contemporary construction from the UK,

France, the US and Australia). She was able to highlight some conservation issues and repair

and restoration principles, before concluding with the question: down to Earth…is there a

future? Since earthen architecture provides relief from the heat of the day and comfort

during the cold night and it was sustainable: so Yioutani-Iacovides believed it did have a

future.

The final presentation was by Clara Willett, from the Conservation & Research Team at

Historic England. Her presentation focussed on

the Strategic Stone Study

. In her biography

Willets had explained that she had been involved in this study for some time and that she had

been involved in writing the revised Practical Building Conservation Handbook on Stone.

The Strategic Stone Study was aimed at improving our understanding of the indigenous stones

in England, their occurrence and availability and their use in historic building. The problem

was how to match stones, for sensitive repairs, extensions to listed buildings and new

buildings in environmentally sensitive areas.

With repairs it was important to match the aesthetics, the mineral content and the durability

of the stone. Consequently, the study sought to address the problems of identifying the stone

type. Often the historic source was unknown and/or the historic source had gone since many

original quarries had closed down. Often nothing similar was commercially available.

The Symonds Report (2004)

Planning for the Supply of Natural Building and Roofing Stone in

England and Wales

recognised that there was no single source of information. As a result it

had recommended: that Mineral Planning Authorities should identify and protect ‘heritage

quarries’; and a National database of building and roofing stones should be established.

The solution lay in using a combination of historic maps and records. Field work has to date

identified: 12,759 building stone sources; 3,374 building stones; and 15,867 representative

buildings and villages in 36 counties. The British Geological Society (BGS) had hosted GIS

studies and data for each county was now available in Excel spreadsheets format: for each

county, a ‘Building Stone Atlas’ pdf had been produced.

Links had been established with Mineral Planning Authorities with a view to reopening

quarries. By linking the county spreadsheets to the National Heritage List the Building Stone

Atlases could be used to ensure the correct stone was used when working on a listed building.

This information was available from Historic England.

The Day Conference ended with a final question and answer session, chaired by Marion

Barter. The discussion started by referring back to the opening presentation by Dr Marcel

Vellinga and what we meant by vernacular.