2

with concave oblong circular figures on
one side. There were various types of
pattern. It was sold in squares, of 12 or 14
in by 15 or 16in.

WEIGHTS AND QUANTITIES
These may conflict with information
gleaned by other researchers, as meas-
ures and quantities seem to have varied at
different periods (and possibly in differ-
ent places).
-  Crib: a hundredweight or 150 sq feet.
-  Case: 24 leaves, half cases also sold, of
12 leaves. Neve - a case ranged from 25
tables (French glass) to 45 of Newcastle.
This dependent on diameter of the table:
those 5 square foot were 45 to the case,
at 6 square foot there were 35.
-  Table or leaf: each unit of glass, uncut,
e.g. circles, or segmentally headed rec-
tangles in broad glass. According to Neve,
tables of crown were 3 ft 6 in or 3 ft 8 in,
giving area of 9-10 ft2. The case then had
a quantity of 220-240 ft2. Tables of crown
became larger during the 18th century,
measuring up to 5 ft and 6 ft in diameter.
-  Webb or way: this peculiar term to
describe a quantity of glass seems to have
been applied only in regard to Rhenish
glass. Each webb consisted of bunches of
six glass plates of about two square foot.
At the end of the 17th century there were
100 bunches per webb, but later 60 was
the usual amount.
-  Squares: the common term to describe
a rectangular pane of glass in timber
casements or sashes. Very often building
accounts only mention the term without
giving exact sizes. Sometimes this is elabo-
rated upon - the general sizes being from
6inby8inupwards, with l9inby 12 in
and 12 in by 16 in usual. Though most
panes were rectangular, square ones are
also found.
-  Quarries: Neve gives details about
calculating sizes of quarries, and the stand-
ards used, which would be of relevance
to anyone needing to calculate exact
measurements but are not necessary here.
Suffice to mention that there were two
types, ordinary and long, and that the
most usual size was 12s (meaning that
there are 12 of l2sinafootofglass); these
are 6 in long by 4  in wide.
-  Measuring glass according to weight:
Neve quotes a Mr Leybourn as stating
that225ftofglass equals about 200 lb, i.e.
9 ft is about 8 lb weight. In an article
which mentioned that the chapel in Dub-
lin Castle bought 600 lb of glass in the late
14th century, the author quotes the then
(1920s) clerk of works at York Minsteras
estimating 3 lb per foot of glass. The
discrepancy is interesting and may be
explained by extreme thinness of good
crown, which weighs less per foot.
It is hoped that this short explanation of
types and terms may be of some use to
those who come into contact with this
most aesthetic of materials. I am very
interested in any other information on
this subject, or others linked to it, if
anyone has snippets or knows of obscure
sources that I may have missed.
Nessa Roche is based in Dublin
CONTEXT 48

2